Adolphus Confederate Uniforms offers Frederick R. Adolphus' scholarly research, articles, and his book Imported Confederate Uniforms of Peter Tait & Co...as well as large images with construction detail.
  • New Research
    • The Quintessential Confederate Cap, Part IV: Trans-Mississippi Caps, Cap Covers, General Usage and Legacy
    • The Quintessential Confederate Cap, Part III: Caps of the Lower South
    • The Quintessential Confederate Cap, Part II: Caps of the Richmond Clothing Bureau
    • The Quintessential Confederate Cap, Part I: Overview
    • Confederate Uniforms of the Lower South, Part V: Miscellaneous Clothing from the Region at Large
    • Confederate Uniforms of the Lower South, Part IV: Atlantic Seaboard
    • Confederate Uniforms of the Lower South, Part III: Georgia and the Army of Tennessee
    • Confederate Uniforms of the Lower South, Part II: Tennessee, East Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama
    • Confederate Uniforms of the Lower South, Part I: Tennessee, East Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama
    • The South's White Uniforms
    • Confederate Depot Uniforms of the Department of Alabama, Mississippi ans East Louisiana, Part III: The Pants, Caps and Hats of the Department’s Depot, and the Cadet Gray Uniforms of Mobile, Alabama
    • Confederate Depot Uniforms of the Department of Alabama, Mississippi and East Louisiana, 1864-1865, Part II
    • Confederate Depot Uniforms of the Department of Alabama, Mississippi and East Louisiana, 1864-1865, Part I
    • Comparing Color of Cadet Gray Kersey: Originals vs. Replicas
    • State of Alabama Quartermaster Uniforms, 1861-1864
    • Homemade Clothes of Burton Marchbanks, 30th Texas Cavalry
    • Size and Manufacturer Markings in Confederate Clothing
    • Two Rebel Hats
    • Basics of Confederate Uniforms
    • Peter Tait Trousers Finally Surface
    • Two Rebel Haversacks
    • The Imported British Overcoat for the Confederate Army
    • Tailor-Made from Issued Cloth: Brunet’s Confederate Uniform, Mobile 1864-65.
    • Lower South Jacket of John B.L. Grizzard, Hanleiter's Georgia Battery
    • The Confederate Depot Sack Coat: An Overlooked Garment
    • The Confederate Soldier of Fort Mahone
    • Francis M. Durham "Peter Tait" Imported Jacket
    • A Mississippi Depot Uniform
    • Virginia Army Uniform: A Conjecture
    • John Calhoun Back Charleston Depot Jacket
  • Free Article Downloads
  • Store
  • Reenactor's Pictorial Journey
  • About The Author
  • Related Links
  • Copyright and Terms of Use
  • A few kind words
Picture
034: An unidentified artilleryman of the Army of Northern Virginia wears a variegated gray-red-gray Richmond Depot artillery cap. Image courtesy of the Chris Carroll collection,

The Quintessential Confederate Cap, Part II: Caps of the Richmond Clothing Bureau
Fred Adolphus, 9 June 2023
Updated 27 April 2025

Continued from Part I: click here to navigate back to the previous page...

Having touched upon the different variants of Confederate caps, we return to the quintessential Confederate chasseur cap.  It now bears talking about this cap’s mass production through the Quartermaster Department.  Each regional clothing bureau established its own manufacturing depots and contracts for clothing, and these different operations made their own subtly distinct caps.  These differences allow us to identify them to specific depots.  The largest and most significant of all the clothing operations was the Richmond Clothing Bureau, or Depot.  Several of its quartermaster issue, enlisted caps survive in collections today.
 
The Richmond Depot is renowned for having made its uniforms according to fairly stringent pattern specifications.  Its jackets are easily identifiable as such, and no less, its caps are distinguishable from those of other depots.  Surviving originals provide information pertaining to its basic characteristics and dimensions.  While subtle nuances might vary slightly from cap to cap, the general templated pattern is identical.  General characteristics include the following.27

The chief basic cloth used in making the Richmond Depot caps was imported, blue-gray kersey, or satinet of the same color. In this study I use the contemporary terms for these imported fabrics: cadet gray and Confederate gray, and I use them interchangeably. The Confederate Quartermaster Department, and Southerners themselves used these terms for this color of cloth, so I am using the terms herein, rather than the less common, contemporary term of "English army cloth," which has found currency among modern reenactors.
 
The body consisted of a one-piece band, two side pieces and a crown piece, sewn in the chasseur style with a countersunk crown.  Approximate measurements are: band 1 1/8 to 1 ¼ inches wide; sides in front above the band to the fold in the crown 1 5/8 to 1 ¾ inches high, sides in the rear above the band to the fold ca 5 inches high; diameter of crown inside the folds about 4 ½ inches, and diameter with folded edges about 5 3/8 inches.

Picture
034a: Rowan cap: front and crown. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
034b: Rowan cap: rear view. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
The visor was made of pasteboard covered with black enameled cloth.  The outside edge of the visor has a welt, approximately one inch wide folded over the edge and machine-sewn in place.  The visor is about 1/8 inch thick, and is whip-stitched to the front on the cap.  The visor was usually finished with a shiny coating of varnish.  The visor has a distinctive, templated pattern, measuring side to side, across the ends 6 3/8 to 6 5/8 inches long; side to side, across the middle 6 ½ to 6 13/16 inches long; front to rear from the front edge to the line between the ends 4 to 4 5/8 inches wide; and front to rear, in the center from the front edge to the seam line 1 7/8 to 2 inches wide.  The visor end points are cut off, forming a flat edge about ¼ inch across.

 
Picture
034c: Caption: 034c: Top of visor. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
The lining was made of an unbleached white, osnaburg cotton, usually consisting of two side-pieces and a crown piece, that conformed roughly to the outside form of the cap; the sides sewn to the crown in the same countersunk manner as the body.  To a lesser degree, a bag-style lining with a draw string closure at the top was employed (a pattern made from a single piece of cloth, with one seam, that did not conform to the outside cap pattern).
 
The sweatband was made of black enameled cloth (varnished); sewn to the base of the cap, turned and ironed down, then whip-stitched around the base and frequently whip-stitched to the lining on the sides; the finished measurement is 1 1/16 to 1 ¼ inches wide. In some cases, the bottom edge of the sweatband has an unfinished edge that is whip stitched to the base. The base of the cap, under the sweatband, had a buckram interlining.  This stiffening was approximately the same width as the sweatband.

Picture
034d: Sweatband, conforming lining and bottom of visor. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Gladium II Catalog, December 2011.
Picture
034e: Bag style lining, sweatband and bottom of visor. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
The chinstrap was made of black enameled cloth, also varnished, the same as the visor components.  Most of the surviving Richmond caps are missing their chinstraps, but of the six that remain intact, four are adjustable, two-piece; one is a non-functional, one-piece type; and, the last is not visible in the available photo.  The ends of the chinstraps are all cut off straight, where the buttons are attached, and all have unfinished, raw edges.  The chinstraps are approximately 7/16 inches wide.  The functional, two-piece chinstraps have keeper loops sewn in place, made of the same raw-cut enameled cloth, and of the same width as the straps.  On these, the adjusting end has a small tab sticking out the side of the keeper for the soldier to pinch and pull.  There was no “correct” side for the adjustment tab: it ended up on whatever side the seamstress happened to put it on when she was attaching the chinstrap to the cap.  Of the four functional chinstraps, two adjust on the right side, and two on the left.  The chinstrap buttons, when still intact, include a variety of types: japanned tin, white glass shirt buttons, white bone trouser buttons, Confederate “A” and “I” buttons, and state seal buttons.

Picture
034f: Chinstrap and infantry “I” button. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Gladium II Catalog, December 2011.
Picture
034g: Artillery “A” button. Artifact and image courtesy of Will Gorges, Battleground Antiques, New Bern, North Carolina.
The Richmond caps were made in both the solid, basic cloth color, or in a “variegated” color scheme unique to the Richmond Depot.  The plain, cadet gray caps (with the band, sides and crown all of the same color) might have served as a “universal issue” cap since they were devoid of a specific, branch-trim color.  The variegated version was branch specific.  The variegated color scheme had the cap’s band and crown of one color and the side pieces of a contrasting color.  For instance, variegated artillery caps might have a red band and crown with cadet gray sides, or a cadet gray band and crown with red sides.  The surviving, variegated enlisted caps incorporate the red artillery color.  No enlisted caps remain with an infantry color scheme.  However, one variegated officer cap with the infantry trim color of light blue has survived.  At least two variegated officer artillery caps survive and two survive with black trim-color cloth.  No variegated cavalry caps, that is Richmond caps trimmed with yellow cloth, remain at all.
 
Confederate staff officer, McHenry Howard, described artillerymens' caps as “variegated,” and it is from Howard’s account that I have adopted this contemporary term.  Howard recalled how in the spring of 1865, a brigade of heavy artillery was armed with muskets, and re-organized as infantry, with about 1,400 men.  “The heavy artillerymen having been stationary around Richmond had been able to keep their uniforms in better plight, and their scarlet caps and trimmings (artillery color) made them present a distinctive appearance to the army, of which they were now a regular part.”  McHenry noted the brigade’s bravery and uniforms during the retreat from Richmond.  “In fact, it is evident to me that the fresher and variegated caps and uniforms of the heavy artillerymen made the enemy suppose they belonged to the ‘Navy Brigade’ or battalion…”
 
Another observation, this made a Union officer in August 1864, may also refer to Richmond Depot, variegated caps.  The officer remarked of 2nd Maryland Infantry prisoners, “Among them [the Confederate prisoners] were a number of their Maryland brigade, quite well dressed and superior men… They had the remains of fancy clothes on, including little kepis, half grey and half sky blue.”28
 
Remarkably, many officers copied this unique style when having tailors make their caps.  This may indicate that the Richmond enlisted cap’s variegated color scheme was perceived as unique to the Army of Northern Virginia, and that the officer corps wanted their caps to reflect this style.  Benjamin S. Pendleton’s artillery cap and Captain James Lyle Clarke’s infantry cap are two examples of variegated officer caps, complete with gold braid, that were worn in 1864-65.  However, there is some evidence to suggest that early-war, officer’s caps may have inspired the Richmond Depot variegated pattern.  Two such caps have provenance to 1861-62.  One is an artillery cap with gold braid worn by Lieutenant Charles Ellis Munford who was killed at Malvern Hill.  The other was worn by Captain Benjamin Chase, who likewise died in May 1862.  Chase’s cap has no gold braid, and the band and crown were made from black velvet. The sides included dark gray, fine woolen cloth.  Another variegated officer cap survives from the late-war period: that of First Lieutenant William H. Harwood, 3rd Virginia Cavalry.  Harwood’s cap offers further documentation for the officer’s preference for the variegated color scheme.
 
Surviving, original Richmond caps have provenance to the last year of the war.  This late provenance is reflected in the imported fabrics they are made from: cadet gray kersey and satinet, red satinet, fine scarlet woolen, and Confederate, light blue kersey.  The heavy use of cadet gray and light blue kerseys for the manufacture of jackets and trousers probably yielded ample quantities of scrap cloth with which to make caps.  This might account for the significant number of plain, cadet gray caps that survive today.  Prior to the arrival of the aforementioned fabrics, the Richmond Depot would have made caps of coarse, Southern-made fabrics, such as cassimere and jeans, or of kersey from the Crenshaw Woolen Mill in Richmond.  Crenshaw woolens came in both fine and coarse grades.  The “Crenshaw’s gray” woolen which sold for $28.00 per yard was a superior, officer grade article.  Crenshaw’s “coarse jeans,” at $4.00 a yard, was intended for enlisted clothing.29  The Crenshaw Mill dyed its own woolens and produced “light blue and grey cloths” for Confederate uniforms.30  Since no Richmond caps survive from the first two years of the war, one has to rely on written records and contemporary images to ascertain what the caps were made from.  Surviving uniforms from the period that appear to have been made from Crenshaw’s gray cloth indicate that it was a blue gray hue, much lighter than the imported cadet gray.  Crenshaw may also have made light blue, dark blue, black and red trim cloths.  The limited records indicate that the early Richmond caps were made from gray and blue “casimere” and “military cloth,” perhaps from the Crenshaw Woolen Mill.  The mill was destroyed by a fire on May 15, 1863, thereby ending its production for the Confederacy.

Ironically, available manufacturing records for Richmond caps date from the first two years of the war, May 1861 to June 1863, precisely the period from which no depot caps survive.  These include invoices from ten cap and cap component manufacturers, of whom the largest producers were Frank Binford, and Charles and Mary McIndoe.  Total purchases by the Richmond quartermaster during this period included 87,834 caps, and payment for perforating 13,341 visors (along the interior edge of the visor for attachment to the cap).  Descriptions of the caps in the invoices are minimal, but include the following for 1861: “Grey Caps,” “Blue Caps,” “Cadet Caps,” “Grey Fatigue Caps,” “Blue Fatigue Caps,” “Fatigue Caps,” and “Gen’l Johnson Camp Caps.”  In 1862, caps were described as “Grey Caps,” “Blue Caps,” “Grey Fatigue Caps,” “Forage Caps,” “Cap Covers,” and “Gen’l Johnson Camp Caps.”  In 1863, invoices carried, “Grey Caps,” “Light Grey Caps,” “Grey Cadet Caps,” “Military Caps,” and “Beaverteen Caps.”  The beaverteen caps were made from a heavy twilled cotton fabric that had an uncut pile and a short nap.31

Further information from the 1863 invoices confirms the use of cassimere to make caps, along with oil cloth, bone buttons, spool cotton thread, binder boards, military cloth, cap fronts, and sheep skins.  The oil cloth and sheep skins would have been used for sweatbands, and the binders board (pasteboard) for cap crown and band stiffening.  Frank Binford’s records indicate that the government routinely supplied him with the buttons that he used to for his caps.32  The cap fronts, or visors, were manufactured as separate component that was also furnished to cap makers by the quartermaster.  The cap fronts were made of pasteboard, covered with oil cloth top and bottom, with a machine-stitched, oil cloth welt around the exterior edge of the visor.33

Conjecturally, the gray and blue fabrics used from 1861 to 1863 were domestic products, possibly even Crenshaw mill woolens.  The cassimere fabrics were not from the Crenshaw mill, but were products of at least two weavers: Benbow and Yadkins.  In any case, the invoices largely pre-date the arrival and usage of imported cadet gray and light blue cloth in Virginia.34  Furthermore, purchases of at least 88,000 caps by the Richmond quartermaster in two years would have supplied roughly half of the Army of Northern Virginia with caps (allowing for an issue of one cap each year per soldier).

At least fifteen, Richmond Depot, enlisted, government-issue caps have survived to present day, by far the largest number of caps from any single depot.  While the Richmond cap may not have been the first choice of headgear in Lee’s army, the surviving caps indicate that significant numbers were issued to “Virginia Army” troops.  Quartermaster records likewise indicate that the Richmond Depot manufactured and issued significant quantities of caps to the Army of Northern Virginia.  For instance, during the 3rd and 4th quarters of 1864 and up to 21 January 1865, the quartermaster made field issues to the Army of Northern Virginia amounting to 27,011 hats and caps.35  Judging from the proportions of surviving originals, and corresponding images, it seems that artillerymen were especially fond of wearing caps.  In fact, all of the surviving Richmond enlisted caps with colored trim are artillery caps (having red colored trim in variegated configuration).  Given that there were many more infantrymen than artillerymen, yet half the surviving Richmond enlisted caps are artillery, it is reasonable to assume that a much higher percentage of artillerymen wore caps than infantry.  Contemporary images of Confederate prisoners and other substantiating data suggests that Lee’s infantrymen wore caps to a far lesser degree than artillerymen, but they wore them nonetheless.  Interestingly, at least two of the surviving caps were worn by cavalrymen. 
 
There are nine fully-authenticated, solid, cadet gray Richmond caps: i.e. the crown, side and band pieces all made from the same color of cloth.  Three of these caps have provenance.  The general construction and the enameled visors are the same for all of these identified as Richmond caps.  With the exception of the Rowan satinet cap, all are made of coarse, cadet gray kersey.  The linings are all unbleached osnaburg, although two linings are cut in the “adjustable bag” style. 

The first of these plain, cadet gray caps resides in the Michael Kramer collection.  It retains its two-piece chinstrap that is secured with two, natural white bone, four-hole trouser buttons.  The sweatband is missing, which has left the lining loose, enabling one to lift the side and look at the interior construction of the cap.  The cap is made with quarter-inch seams and sewn together with black thread.  The lining is cut in the bag style with its pull cord to adjust at the top.  The bag lining has only one seam at rear.  The inside of the crown is covered with a layer of osnaburg that is whipstitched around the edge.  A portion of this cover has been removed, perhaps due to damage, but the remainder retains a penciled name, rather faded and indistinct.  Other than the penciled name, the cap is without provenance.

Picture
035a: Right front view of the Kramer general service, Richmond Depot cap. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035b: Left front view of the Kramer cap. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035c: Left rear view of the Kramer cap. Of special not is the excellent restoration work completed on the cap. The restored fabric matches the original so well that care must be taken not to confuse the modern fabric for the original. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035d: Right rear view of the Kramer cap. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035e: Left view of the chinstrap and bone button, the enameled visor cloth, and the machine stitching of the visor welt. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035f: Right view of the chinstrap and bone button, to include the pointed end of the strap. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035g: Top view of the crown and top of the visor. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035h: Interior view of the bag style lining and the bottom of the visor. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035i: Close view of the bag style lining and the bottom of the visor. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035j: Close view of the edge of the visor welt and its machine stitching. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035k: The deterioration to the base of the cap allows the lining to be safely pulled aside so that the interior construction might be viewed. A portion of the crown lining has been torn away. The faint markings left by the cap's original owner are also visible. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035l: The original owner's name is faded and indistinct, but a large "W" is legible at the beginning of the inscription. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035m: The inside of the lining is visible, as well as the tightly drawn closure of the top of the bag. Interestingly, the rear seam of the cap side pieces has been reinforced with a strip of osnaburg, whip stitched in place. This feature is presumably original to the cap and not a restoration feature. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035o: Another interior view highlights the pasteboard crown and the method of attachment to the sides. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035p: This image offers a close view of the Confederate gray, kersey fabric and weave. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
Picture
035q: Another close view of the blue-gray, kersey fabric and weave. Artifact courtesy of the Michael D. Kramer collection.
The second cap likewise has an adjustable bag lining.  The cap retains its enameled sweatband, with the bottom edge folded inwards and whipstitched in place.  The top edge is not stitched to the lining.  The cap’s chinstrap and buttons are missing.  The cap has no provenance.36

Picture
036a: Front of the New York souvenir cap, and the top of the visor. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Picture
036b: Right side and top of the cap. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Picture
036c: Right side of the cap. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Picture
036d: Left side of the cap. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Picture
036e: Rear of the cap. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Picture
036f: View of the visor welt's machine stitching. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Picture
036g: Interior view: bottom of visor, sweatband, and attachment of visor to front of cap. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Picture
036h: Interior view: bag style lining, and sweatband. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Picture
036i: Close view of the drawstring closure of the bag lining and the unbleached osnaburg lining. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Picture
036j: Image of the pasteboard, band stiffening. This particular cap did not have a buckram stiffening component inside the band. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Picture
036k: Close view of the sweatband whip-stitch attachment, the osnaburg lining, and the pasteboard, band stiffening. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Military Museum, Saratoga Springs, New York.
Two caps from the Gary Hendershott collection have the more common “conforming pattern” linings.  The first of these has retained its two-piece chinstrap that is secured with Roman “I” buttons (Tice CSI203Am).  The enameled sweatband’s bottom edge is folded inwards and whipstitched in place, while the top edge is basted to the lining.37  Hendershott’s other cap is missing its chinstrap and buttons.  Its sweatband is secured to the base the same as the aforementioned Hendershott cap, but the top edge has been left unattached.  Neither of these caps have provenance.

Picture
037a: Front view, general service, Richmond Depot cap with infantry "I" buttons. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Gladium II Catalog, December 2011.
Picture
037b: Right, front view of cap, includes details of the chinstrap. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Gladium II Catalog, December 2011.
Picture
037c: Left side view of cap, includes details of the chinstrap. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Gladium II Catalog, December 2011.
Picture
037d: Rear view of cap. The Confederate gray kersey and weave are visible in this image. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Gladium II Catalog, December 2011.
Picture
037e: Close view of the Roman, lined "I", infantry, chinstrap button. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Gladium II Catalog, December 2011.
Picture
037f: Interior view of the conforming style, osnaburg lining, sweatband and the bottom of the visor. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Gladium II Catalog, December 2011.
Picture
037g: close view of the osnaburg lining and sweatband. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott, Gladium II Catalog, December 2011.
Picture
038a: General service, Richmond Depot cap, Lot 216, right front view. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott Museum Consultants, Lot 216, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Picture
038b: Left side view of the Lot 216 cap. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott Museum Consultants, Lot 216, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Picture
038c: View of cap crown and top of visor. The generous, wide fold of the countersunk crown, so common to Confederate chasseur caps, is clearly visible in this image. Artifact and image courtesy of Russ Hayes, Volunteer Relics, Clarksville, Tennessee.
Picture
038d: Front view of cap. Artifact and image courtesy of Russ Hayes, Volunteer Relics, Clarksville, Tennessee.
Picture
038e: Close view showing the attachment of the visor to front of the cap. Artifact and image courtesy of Brian "Rebel" Akins, Rebel Relics, Gladeville, Tennessee.
Picture
038f: Rear view of cap. Artifact and image courtesy of Russ Hayes, Volunteer Relics, Clarksville, Tennessee.
Picture
038g: Interior view of the Lot 216 cap: osnaburg, conforming lining; enameled cloth sweatband; bottom of visor, and attachment details of the visor to the cap. Some of the stitching of the visor to the front of the cap, and along the sweatband, may be restoration work. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott Museum Consultants, Lot 216, Little Rock, Arkansas.
The next cap was worn by Captain Robert C. Rowan, Company D, 62nd Tennessee Infantry.  Rowan’s regiment participated in the 1864 Shenandoah Valley Campaign, and was supplied by the Richmond Depot.  Despite the fact that Rowan was an officer, he wore an enlisted depot cap, as did many officers.  In contrast to the solid, cadet gray caps thus far discussed, its basic cloth is satinet.  The chinstrap and buttons are missing, but the sweatband is intact.  The sweatband appears to have an unfinished bottom edge, whip stitched in place, but left unattached at the top edge.  The osnaburg lining is cut in the conforming pattern.38
 
Picture
039a: Rowan general service, Richmond Depot cap: right front view. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
039b: Rowan cap front and top of visor. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
039c: Right side view. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
039d: Left side view. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
039e: Right rear view. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
039f: Left rear view. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
039g: Close view of the Confederate gray satinet, basic cloth. The bleached white warp of the fabric is visible through the heavy nap due to moth damage along the surface. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
039h: Interior view of the sweatband and conforming pattern, unbleached osnaburg lining. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
039i: This magnified view of the interior shows details of the sweatband attachment (whip stitched along the base), and the bottom of the visor with its characteristic, machine stitched welt. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
039j: Another perspective of the lining and sweatband. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Picture
039k: Details of the visor attachment to the front of the cap: whipstitched through the sweatband. It is possible that this construction was done by a conservator due to the visor having been loose. Artifact and image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
Two more general service caps survive with provenance, as well.  Remarkably, both were worn by cavalrymen.  The first of these “cavalry” caps was worn by First Sergeant William Edward Kite, Company A, 3rd Battalion Virginia Mounted Reserves.  The company was mustered into service on 3 April 1864, and was also called Chrisman’s Boy Company for its leader, Captain George Chrisman.  It served in Virginia through to the war’s end, although many of its members transferred to regular army commands upon turning eighteen.  The company participated in battles in the Valley and served in the Richmond vicinity.  Kite is thought to have been assigned to the company throughout its service.  He probably got his cap at the same time that he got his Richmond Type 3 jacket with Roman “A” buttons, presumably late in the war.  Both the cap and jacket are made of Confederate gray kersey.
 
The cap follows to usual tailoring of Richmond caps with a conforming, unbleached osnaburg lining.  The basic cloth is coarse grade, imported blue-gray kersey. The dilapidated condition allows for a view of the interior components, including the pasteboard crown.  Additionally, the cap has some unusual interior components: buckram interlining all the way up the sides; a pasteboard band stiffener; and, an unbleached osnaburg sweatband, that matches the lining.  Kite also wrote his name on the inside crown lining.
 
The visor is the usual pasteboard covered with enameled cloth with an enameled welt machine-stitched around the outer edge.  However, the chinstrap is leather with a japanned iron, adjustment buckle, a feature seen on no other Richmond cap.  The chinstrap is secured with white glass, shirt buttons. Another unusual feature includes a third glass button attached to the rear of the cap band, presumably to secure a rain cover.39

Picture
040a: A front view of the Kite cap. The buckram stiffening that extends all the way up the sides of the cap is visible through the moth-damage holes. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
Picture
040b: The kite cap has an unusual chinstrap. It is the usual two-piece, adjustable type found on Richmond caps, but it is made of leather instead of enameled cloth, and it has a japanned tin adjustment buckle. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
Picture
040c: Right front view of the kite cap. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
Picture
040d: Left side view that shows the white glass shirt button used to secure the chinstrap. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
Picture
040e: Both chinstrap buttons are intact, and an additional button (likewise a white glass shirt button), is attached to the rear of the band, presumably to secure a rain cover. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
Picture
040f: This left front view sows the strong, unfaded Confederate gray color of the kersey, basic cloth. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
Picture
040g: This interior view shows the bottom of the visor, and the conforming pattern, osnaburg lining. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
Picture
040h: Another interior view shows the widely-spaced, attachment stitching for the visor. Additionally, the unusual, osnaburg sweatband can be seen here: a departure from the typical enameled cloth swatband. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
Picture
040i: Kite wrote his name on the crown lining of his cap, W.E. Kite, which is legible, albeit somewhat smudged. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
Picture
040j: Kite's Richmond Depot jacket is also part of the Miller-Kite House collection. The Confederate gray, kersey jacket matches the cap, and may have been issued along with it. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
Picture
040k: This image shows Kite wearing a Richmond Depot jacket, possibly the same one that is in the collection. The jacket in the image has wooden, Confederate quartermaster buttons. The artifact has brass buttons. Perhaps Kite swapped the wooden buttons for brass after he got the jacket. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House collection, Elkton, Virginia.
The second of the two cavalryman caps was worn by Charles Alexander Womack, Company E, 6th Virginia Cavalry.  Womack served with the regiment from November 1863 until he was captured on 3 April 1865.  He presumably received his cap late in the war.
 
Womack’s cap closely mirrors Kite’s cap.  The chief differences are that Womack’s cap has the usual enameled cloth sweatband and lacks the buckram interlining that extends all the way up the sides.  In fact, the cap may even lack buckram interlining in the band, although this is difficult to ascertain in the images.  The chinstrap and buttons are missing.  Womack was captured while a patient in the Confederate General Hospital in Richmond, Virginia.  He penned his name, the time, date and place of his capture, as well as the city where he was transferred to (Newport News), on the inside of the crown lining.40

Picture
041a: Womack's cap very dilapidated, but its basic characteristics are discernible. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy of the Pittsylvania Historical Society collection, Chatham, Virginia.
Picture
041b: Womack's cap is made from the typical Confederate gray, imported kersey. The machine stitching on the top of the visor is damaged but visible. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy of the Pittsylvania Historical Society collection, Chatham, Virginia.
Picture
041c: A left side view of the cap. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy of the Pittsylvania Historical Society collection, Chatham, Virginia.
Picture
041d: This view shows the bottom of the visor, the unbleached osnaburg, conforming pattern lining, and the enameled cloth sweatband. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy of the Pittsylvania Historical Society collection, Chatham, Virginia.
Picture
041e: This interior view shows the stitching attachment for the sweatband and Womack's inscription on the crown lining. The inscription reads: Mon M 8 1/2 o: Monday Morning 8:30 o'clock (time of capture); C A Womack: Charles A. Womack; Cap Apl 3, 65: Captured April 3, 1865; Richd VA Newport News VA: (place of capture) Richmond, Virginia, (transferred to) Newport News Virginia. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy of the Pittsylvania Historical Society collection, Chatham, Virginia.
Picture
041f: This image provides a better view of Womack's inscription. Image courtesy of Gregg Starbuck; artifact courtesy of the Pittsylvania Historical Society collection, Chatham, Virginia.

Another Richmond Depot look-alike resides in the American Civil War Museum collection. This is a tailor-made copy of the Richmond cap with some notable quirks.  The basic cloth is coarse, cadet gray kersey.  The cap body is made from a single “side” piece with the seam in the front. The band piece also has its seam in the front. Such tailoring is a mystery for two reasons. It requires a very uneconomical cut in the cloth. It also makes the cap ill-fitting since it eliminates the curvature found in the rear seam that conforms to the shape of the head. In any case, the cap also has raw-cotton padded, polished white cotton fabric, machine-stitched quilting, a comfortable extravagance that mass-produced caps never had.  The sweatband is dark russet-colored leather, which is another high-quality feature not afforded Richmond quartermaster caps. The band is reinforced with a pasteboard liner.  The chinstrap, buttons and visor are missing.  First Sergeant Richard Edward Wright, Company F, 55th Virginia Infantry, wore this deluxe cap in 1864.

Picture
042a: The Richard Edward Wright cap is missing its visor and we can only speculate that the visor must have been a high quality, bound leather one, based on the deluxe tailoring of the cap. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
042b: The left front of the Wright cap shows its band and side seams: an unusual construction technique. The cap's basic cloth is imported, Confederate gray kersey. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
042c: The heavy moth damage to the basic cloth allows us to view the inside construction. The band is reinforced with pasteboard. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
042d: The right rear of the cap shows its unusual tailoring: the side component is made of a single piece of cloth without a seam in the rear; the band piece likewise has no rear seam. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
042e: The moth damage to the top of the cap leaves the pasteboard crown visible, as well as the cotton batting that interlines the sides. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
042f: This image shows the color difference between the outer surface of the basic, Confederate gray cloth and the protected inner surface. The outer surfaces is darkly soiled by exposure to coal smoke, a result of Richmond, Virginia's air pollution in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The protected bottom side of the cloth retains its original, bright blue-gray color. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
042g: A closer view of the cap's interlining: it appears to have enameled cloth added for waterproofing and stiffening. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
042h: The interior view of the lining shows the machine stitched, batting that lines the sides and crown. The batting has been made with polished cotton cloth and cotton batting quilted together. The high quality, leather sweatband is wide and whip stitched to the base with close stitches. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
042i: A close view of the interior shows the pasteboard interlining in the base. The meaning of the numerous penned markings, "43", has been lost to the cap's provenance. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
042j: This close view of the sweatband shows how it is whip stitched to the base with close stitches. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.

A look-alike Richmond cap, made in the enlisted, chasseur pattern, was worn by 2nd Lieutenant William B. Wise.  Wise was assigned to Company A, 46th Virginia Infantry and served as a doctor.  The cap has a black, wool broadcloth band (two-piece).  The sides and crown are made of black satinet.  The visor is unbound, glazed leather and the leather chinstrap has an adjusting buckle and is secured with Virginia buttons.  The inside is lined with light brown silk and the sweatband is russet leather.  Perhaps the basic black color reflects affiliation with the medical corps.  Wise’s simple cap is indicative of an officer cap made without braid, but of high-quality materials, that otherwise looks like an enlisted cap.

Picture
043: William B. Wise cap. Artifact and image courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
044: Richard Jesse Bailey, Company H, 3rd Arkansas Infantry holds a Richmond cap in his hand. The photographer has written “3 ARK” on its front. This mirror image picture has not been horizontally flipped so that the markings show legibly. Image courtesy of the Arkansas State Archives, Little Rock, Arkansas (see also, Military Images, and Portraits of Conflict Arkansas p. 29).
Regarding the variegated caps, two enlisted artillery caps survive with a “red, cadet gray, red” color scheme, (that is, having a red band and crown with cadet gray sides).  Remarkably, both caps belonged to the same soldier: Private Robert William Royall, 1st Company, Richmond Howitzers.  Royall served in this battery from 1861 until his surrender in Burkville, Virginia, April 24, 1865.  Both caps are nearly identical, with red satinet crown and band cloth, and dark cadet gray, satinet sides.  Both caps are lined with unbleached osnaburg (conforming pattern), and retain their enameled cloth sweatbands.  The visors are both the usual pasteboard, covered with enameled cloth, with a machine-stitched welt around the outer edge.  The cap that resided with Gary Hendershott is more complete, in that it retains its chinstrap and lined Roman “I” buttons, Richmond-made, extra rich, (Tice CSI203Am). The one-piece chinstrap is an anomaly for Richmond caps, and indicates that by the end of the war, the Richmond Depot was simplifying its cap production.  The cap in the American Civil War Museum collection is missing its chinstrap and buttons.  Its buckram stiffener, however, is visible through the damaged areas of the cap.41

Picture
045a: Robert William Royall's first variegated Richmond artillery cap (in the American Civil War Museum collection) is made from red and Confederate gray satinet. The red satinet of the band and crown has a heavier nap than the that of the gray sides, or at least more of the red nap is still intact. The white warp yarns of the gray side pieces are easily visible through the moth-damaged surface. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045b: The top view of Royall's cap shows the crown and the top of the visor. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045c: Right front view of Royall's cap. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045d: Left side view of Royall's cap. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045e: View of the top of the visor, which is separated from the cap. Nonetheless, the attaching threads are still intact. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045f: Close view of the visor and machine stitched welt. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045g: The rear view of the cap shows considerable moth damage, thus exposing the white warp threads of the gray satinet. Nevertheless, there are some patches of intact gray nap that indicate how well covered the surface was when the cloth was new. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045h: A close view of the side shows the blue-gray hue of the Confederate gray satinet. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045i: This image shows the bold color of the Confederate gray satinet and the faded color of the red satinet. While much of the red satinet's nap has remained intact, enough has worn away to expose the white cotton warp and to give the fabric a faded appearance. The red hue was bolder when it was new. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045j: The interior view shows the enameled cloth sweatband and the conforming style, unbleached osnaburg lining. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045k: The bottom of the visor is visible with its minimal attachment stitching to the front of the cap. It is no wonder that so many caps have lost their visors when one sees the flimsy manner in which they were attached to the caps. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045l: This image shows how the lining was cut to extend all the way the base of the cap, with the sweatband tucked over it. It would appear that this cap was made without any stiffener in the band, either pasteboard or buckram. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045m: The whip stitching of the sweatband is visible here, as well as a close view of the osnaburg. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
045n: A close view of the visor welt's machine stitching and the method of attaching the visor to the cap. Again, we see how minimal and widely spaced the stitches were that held the visor in place. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
046a: Robert William Royall's second cap, from the Henershott collection, is more intact than the first. The moth damage is not as bad, and the chinstrap and buttons are intact. Interestingly, the chinstrap is a non-functioning, one-piece model, something uncommon for Richmond caps. Furthermore, the cap has Roman infantry "I" buttons rather than artillery buttons. Hendershott. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott Museum Consultants, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Picture
046b: The second Royall cap has enough mothing to make the white warp in both the gray and red satinet cloth visible, but the Confederate gray satinet retains far more of its original nap than the first cap. So much of the gray nap remains that we get a clear perspective of what the fabric looked like when it was new. Hendershott. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott Museum Consultants, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Picture
046c: This close-up image gives an excellent view of the lined, Roman "I" chinstrap button; the construction of the enameled cloth chinstrap; the attachment of the corner of visor to the cap; the unblemished surface of the Confederate gray satinet; and, the worn surface of red satinet. Hendershott. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott Museum Consultants, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Picture
046d: The right side view of the cap shows it to be relatively intact. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott Museum Consultants, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Picture
046e: The interior view of the cap shows a very intact artifact. The enameled cloth sweatband and the conforming style, unbleached osnaburg lining are undamaged. The visor is fully intact, along with its widely spaced attachment threads. The corners of the visor were, however, very stoutly bound to the base of the cap. Artifact and image courtesy of Gary Hendershott Museum Consultants, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Several contemporary images document this variant of the Richmond artillery cap.  There are two images of soldiers of Crenshaw’s Virginia Artillery Battery wearing this type of cap.  One of the men is identified as Jonathon O. Farrell.  Farrell’s original image is tinted red, in the trim color, and his image is dated three days after St. Patrick’s Day, in Richmond, Virginia, 1862.  Both of the caps have identical brass badges: “C B” with crossed cannon barrels between the letters.  The darker shaded, red crown and band parts are easy to distinguish.  The sides are interpreted as gray components.  Based upon the date of the image, and the early style Richmond jackets, it would appear that the Richmond Depot made the variegated pattern cap from the start.42
 
A picture of Corporal Theodore C. “Doc” Howard, of Parker’s Virginia Battery, shows him wearing a “red, gray, red” Richmond cap, to judge from the black and white photograph.  Howard’s cap has the same type of crossed cannon insignia on the front that the Crenshaw caps have.  The jacket and trouser match in color and coarse texture, but they contrast with the cap’s side-piece cloth, which is of a finer texture and lighter color.43

Picture
047a: Jonathon O. Farrell, Crenshaw’s Virginia Artillery Battery wears a variegated, “red, gray, red” Richmond cap. Farrell has cleverly switched his cap insignia to opposite sides of the cannon, and turned them upside down, so that in the mirrored photo, the initials “CB,” for Crenshaw’s Battery, remain legible. This mirror image has not been horizontally flipped. Image courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
047b: A close view of Farrell's cap. Image courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
047c: Corporal C.T. Howard, Parker’s Battery, also has a “red, gray, red,” variegated, Richmond cap. His cap has the common, crossed cannon badge observed on so many Confederate artillery caps. The brass letters on either side of the cannon are too indistinct to read. Howard’s mirror image has not been horizontally flipped so that the notations remain legible. Image courtesy of Confederate Faces, p. 113, Fig 410, William A. Albaugh III collection.
Picture
047d: A close view of C.T. Howard’s cap. Image courtesy of Confederate Faces, p. 113, Fig 410, William A. Albaugh III collection.
Picture
047e: This artilleryman of Crenshaw’s Virginia Artillery Battery has a variegated, “red, gray, red” Richmond cap. As Farrell did, he switched his cap insignia to opposite sides of the cannon to make them legible in the mirror image as “CB,” for Crenshaw’s Battery. This mirror image has not been horizontally flipped. Image courtesy of Leslie D. Jensen, Johnny Reb.
Picture
047f: A close view of the cap of the unidentified soldier of Crenshaw's Battery. Image courtesy of Leslie D. Jensen, Johnny Reb.
Picture
047g: A Richmond boy wears his a variegated, “red, gray, red” Richmond cap in April 1865. Judging from the numerous photographs of Richmond during April 1865, it seems that every boy in Richmond acquired a cap from the defunct depot after the city’s fall to Federal forces. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress, HQCC 16b 02909a.
Picture
047h: A close view of the Richmond boy with the variegated artillery cap. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress, HQCC 16b 02909a.
As mentioned, officer caps were often made in the variegated style of the Richmond enlisted caps, and two in particular seem to have copied the Royall cap, “red, gray, red” color scheme.  One was owned by Benjamin Pendleton, 2nd Virginia Infantry, “Stonewall Brigade.”  Pendleton served with the Stonewall Brigade early in the war, having been Stonewall Jackson’s courier.  He was present at the surrender at Appomattox in 1865.  His service records indicate that he was a private.  His cap and his own account suggest that he may have been unofficially promoted to 2nd Lieutenant.  Pendleton’s cap is made of fine scarlet cloth with gold lace on the cadet gray sides and in a knot on the red crown.  The composition visor has a layer of pasteboard sandwiched between two layers of leather.  The outer edge is machine sewn without a welt.  The band is two-piece with a seam in the front.  The chinstrap and buttons are missing.  The lining and sweatband are not visible in the available photo.44
 
The other officer cap in a similar color scheme dates to early in the war.  It belonged to Lieutenant Charles Ellis Munford, Letcher’s Virginia Artillery.  Munford was killed at the Battle of Malvern Hill in 1862.  His cap had dark blue sides and a scarlet band and crown made of fine broadcloth.  The band, sides and crown have the gold lace and knot for a lieutenant.  The two-piece, leather chinstrap is secured with Federal enlisted, eagle “A” buttons. The visor appears to be a composition leather one with a leather welt.  The lining and sweatband are not visible in the available photo.  Munford’s cap provides tangible evidence that the variegated color scheme was common in Virginia early in the War.

Picture
048: Benjamin Pendleton cap. Artifact courtesy of Texas Civil War Museum, Fort Worth, Texas.
Picture
049: Charles Ellis Munford cap. Artifact courtesy of Virginia Historical Society, Richmond, Virginia.
The second group of variegated caps includes seven artillery variants with a “cadet gray, red, cadet gray” color scheme.  The first of these was worn by Captain Daniel Morgan, of Hart’s South Carolina Horse Artillery Battery, who was killed in 1864.  Despite having been an officer, Morgan wore this enlisted cap.  The cadet gray fabric is kersey and the red fabric is satinet.  The enameled cloth, two-piece chinstrap is intact, but in poor condition.  It is secured with one remaining lined, script “I” button (Tice CSI215As).  The conforming pattern lining is intact, but the sweatband is missing.  Interestingly, the pasteboard stiffener in the band is still intact and is positioned between the basic cloth of the band and the osnaburg lining (that extends to the base).45

Picture
050a: The front view of the Daniel Morgan cap includes details such as the intact chinstrap and one button, and the use of cadet gray kersey and red satinet fabrics. Artifact courtesy of South Carolina Confederate Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina.
Picture
050b: The left rear view shows moth damage which leaves the pasteboard stiffening in the band. Artifact courtesy of South Carolina Confederate Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina.
Picture
050c: A top view of the crown and top of the visor. Artifact courtesy of South Carolina Confederate Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina.
Picture
050d: This top view of the cap shows how the left side of the cap is missing its chinstrap button. Artifact courtesy of South Carolina Confederate Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina.
Picture
050e: Right side of the cap. Artifact courtesy of South Carolina Confederate Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina.
Picture
050f: Left side of the cap. Artifact courtesy of South Carolina Confederate Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina.
Picture
050g: Rear of the cap. Artifact courtesy of South Carolina Confederate Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina.
Picture
050h: Interior view of the cap. The image has a yellow cast due to poor quality, but the conforming style, osnaburg lining is visible. The sweatband is missing. The visor is attached to the cap with too few, widely spaced stitches. Artifact courtesy of South Carolina Confederate Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina.
Picture
050i: This view shows the unbleached osnaburg lining and the bottom of the visor. Artifact courtesy of South Carolina Confederate Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina.
Picture
050j: This image shows the construction of the enamaled cloth, chinstrap and the intact, English, script "I" chinstrap button. Artifact courtesy of South Carolina Confederate Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina.
The second of these caps was worn by an Army of Northern Virginia soldier: Rice E. Bryan, Company A, 36th Virginia Infantry.  Rice was from Buffalo, Virginia (now West Virginia).  He enlisted in May 1861 in the "Buffalo Guards" and served with the regiment through the Appomattox campaign in April 1865. Soon after the war, a member of the Fife family, possibly Colonel William E. Fife, 36th Virginia Infantry, acquired the cap. Men from the Fife family were from Putnam and Kanawha Counties, West Virginia, and had served with the 22nd and 36th Virginia Infantry Regiments.  It is likely that they were acquainted with Rice E. Bryan.  According to a Fife family descendant, Thomas Fife, the family had nicknamed the artifact the “Drummer Boy’s Cap.”

Picture
096a: The Fife cap includes cadet gray kersey crown and band components and red satinet side pieces. Artifact and images courtesy of Thomas Fife and family.
Picture
096b: This images offers a front view of the Fife cap. Artifact and images courtesy of Thomas Fife and family.
Picture
096c: The inside of the crown has been inscribed with some biographical data which is at present undeciphered. Artifact and images courtesy of Thomas Fife and family.
Picture
096d: The interior of the Fife cap shows the conforming pattern lining, the enamel cloth sweatband and details of the visor's attachment. Artifact and images courtesy of Thomas Fife and family.
More caps have the “cadet gray, red, cadet gray” variegated color scheme.  Three of these have good photos available, but they are without provenance.  These caps are in the following collections: Fort Donelson, National Battlefield Park; Texas Civil War Museum; and, Battleground Antiques.  All three caps are made of satinet basic cloth, both for the cadet gray and the red components.  The Fort Donelson cap is missing most of its chinstrap, only the remnants under the four-hole, tin trouser buttons remain intact.46 The Texas Civil War Museum cap (now in the Tristan Galloway collection) has its two-piece chinstrap intact.  The chinstrap is secured with two black japanned, four-hole, trouser buttons.47  The third of these is from Battleground Antiques.  This cap has remnants of its chinstrap intact connected to its buttons: lined Roman “A” (Tice CSA203As).48  Only images of the interior for the Tristan Galloway cap are available, it having a conforming style lining.

Picture
051a: The Fort Donelson “cadet gray, red, cadet gray” cap is made of Confederate gray and red satinet. Artifact and image courtesy of the Fort Donelson, National Battlefield Park.
Picture
051b: Another angle of the Fort Donelson cap. Unfortunately, there are no images of the inside of the cap. Artifact and image courtesy of the Fort Donelson, National Battlefield Park.
Picture
051c: This view of the Fort Donelson cap shows the intact stamped tin, japanned (now weathered) chinstrap buttons. There is enough mothing to the surface of the satinet to see the white warp of both the red and gray fabrics. Artifact and image courtesy of the Fort Donelson, National Battlefield Park.
Picture
052a: The Texas collection “cadet gray, red, cadet gray” cap matches the others of this type, being made of Confederate gray and red satinet with white cottons warps. This cap has black horn, four-hole chinstrap buttons. Artifact courtesy of the Texas Civil War Museum, Fort Worth, Texas (now in the Tristan Galloway collection).
Picture
052b: The Texas collection cap has the typical Richmond Depot chinstrap. These images show its construction on the left side. Artifact courtesy of the Texas Civil War Museum, Fort Worth, Texas (now in the Tristan Galloway collection).
Picture
052c: Another aspect of the Texas collection cap shows the right side of the chinstrap construction. Unfortunately. no images of the the interior are available. Artifact courtesy of the Texas Civil War Museum, Fort Worth, Texas (now in the Tristan Galloway collection).
Picture
052d: This shows the rear of the the cap. Image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania (artifact now in the Tristan Galloway collection).
Picture
052e: The interior of the cap is possible showing details of the visor attachment. Image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania (artifact now in the Tristan Galloway collection).
Picture
052g: This interior view shows the conforming pattern lining, the sweatband and details of the visor. Image courtesy of The Horse Soldier, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania (artifact now in the Tristan Galloway collection).
Picture
053a: The Battleground Antiques “cadet gray, red, cadet gray” cap is nearly identical to the previous two of this type: it is made of cadet, or Confederate gray and red satinet fabrics with white cottons warps. This cap has branch correct, Roman "A", brass chinstrap buttons. Artifact and image courtesy of Will Gorges, Battleground Antiques, New Bern, North Carolina.
Picture
053b: A view of the right side of the Battleground Antiques cap. Artifact and image courtesy of Will Gorges, Battleground Antiques, New Bern, North Carolina.
Picture
053b: A view of the left side of the Battleground Antiques cap. While the artillery chinstrap buttons remain intact, the chinstrap itself is missing. Artifact and image courtesy of Will Gorges, Battleground Antiques, New Bern, North Carolina.
The last two caps with the “cadet gray, red, cadet gray” color scheme are somewhat elusive.  The first of these two was sold by Deep South Artifacts in about 2002.  The available images are indistinct thumbnail photos which makes a detailed analysis impossible.  Unfortunately, the business owner, Mr. Keith Kenerly, does not have any better images or records of the cap’s whereabouts.49  The second of these was put on auction by a Roanoke, Virginia antique store dealer in May 1992.  According to the store owner’s information and photos, the cap belonged to William Ballard Rowan, 4th Virginia Artillery Battalion.  Based on several color photographs viewed just prior to the cap’s auction, the cadet gray fabric may have been satinet, and the red possibly fine woolen cloth.  The visor and chinstrap were the typical enameled cloth, and the chinstrap buttons were black japanned metal, four-hole, trouser buttons.  None of the photos showed the inside of the cap.50  Unfortunately, the author viewed the photos long before the days of cell phones and was not able to get any images of his own.  Moreover, the provenance is sketchy because there is no Confederate record of either a William Ballard Rowan or a 4th Virginia Artillery Battalion.  Furthermore, since the trail of ownership is unknown for both of these last two caps, the question arises whether they might not be one of the three caps mentioned in the previous paragraph.

Picture
054a: An artist’s rendering of this cap are used for the Kenerly “cadet gray, red, cadet gray” cap since no distinct images remain of the cap and its whereabouts are unknown. Historian artist, Alan Archambault, graciously made a color sketch of the cap to provide a clearer picture of it.
Picture
054b: The thumbnail images are, unfortunately, the only surviving photos of the Kenerly cap. This offers a left side view. Artifact and photo courtesy of Keith Kenerly, Deep South Artifacts, Fredericksburg, Virginia.
Picture
054c: Right side view of the cap. Artifact and photo courtesy of Keith Kenerly, Deep South Artifacts, Fredericksburg, Virginia..
Picture
055a: An image of T.E. Williams, 3rd Company, Washington Artillery, Louisiana Battalion, shows him wearing a Type III Richmond jacket and a dark shaded Richmond cap with a lighter hued crown, suggesting the color scheme “gray, red, gray.” Image courtesy Glen C. Cangelosi, M.D., WashingtonArtillery.com website.
Picture
055b: A close view of Williams' cap. Image courtesy Glen C. Cangelosi, M.D., WashingtonArtillery.com website.
Picture
055c: John Block, Louisiana Guard Artillery Battery, had this image made in Richmond, Virginia, 1863. He wears a Type 3 Richmond jacket and a variegated cap. Judging from the dark hue of the sides, it looks like the cap has a cadet gray, red, cadet gray color scheme.
Picture
055d: A close view of Block's cap.
There is only one surviving variegated Richmond infantry cap, but there are several contemporary images that document its existence. The surviving cap was worn by Captain James L. Clark, Company B, 2nd Maryland Cavalry.  Clark was wearing the cap when he was captured on August 7, 1864.  It is odd that Clark, a cavalry officer, would wear an infantry cap.  He may have acquired it through some unexplained fluke.  Clark’s cap has a cadet gray kersey band and crown with Confederate, light blue kersey sides. The cap has two rows of gold lace for Clark’s rank, and the gold braid chinstrap has a matching, continuation band around the base of the cap.  The buttons are gilted, Louisiana pelican motif (Tice LA223As).  The visor is an officer-quality, glazed, leather bound composition style.  The interior is lined with black Silesia and a dark dress material with black, brown and gold stripes.  The sweatband is russet leather with gold stamping around the top edge.  Perhaps this cap was intended for a Louisiana infantry officer who might have fallen before he could pick it up from the tailor, and Clark bought it instead.51

Picture
056a: James L. Clark's attractive, officer quality, variegated cap has sides made from imported, Confederate light blue cloth. The crown and band are of imported, Confederate gray kersey. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
056b: Clark's cap includes regulation gold lace for a captain, a gold braid chinstrap, and high quality Louisiana pelican buttons. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
056c: A top view shows the crown lace and the top of the visor. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
056d: The left side view shows how an additional piece of gold braid was attached to the base of the cap from the end of one chinstrap button to the next. This feature gave the illusion on continuity with the gold braid of the chinstrap. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
056e: A close view of the right side of the cap shows the gold lace, pelican button, gold braid and the weave of the gray kersey. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
056f: This view of the rear of the cap highlights the imported Confederate, light French blue kersey fabric. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
056g: This image shows the top of the officer quality, two-piece leather, composition visor with a bound edge. The visor has become separated from the front of the cap. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
056h: This image shows the bottom of the visor. This surface does not have the same amount of glazing that the top surface has. The welt has been tightly hand-sewn to keep the components together. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War
Picture
056i: The interior of the cap features a quality leather sweatband with a gold motif along the top edge. The lining is made of two types of fabric. The crown is lined with black silesia, and the sides are lined with an upscale cotton plaid in the colors brown, black and gold. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
056j: A close view of the interior shows the closely-spaced, hand whip-stitching along the base that secure the sweatband to the cap. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Another cavalry officer’s variegated cap, that of First Lieutenant William H. Harwood’s does not follow any branch color scheme (certainly not the cavalry colors).  Harwood served with the 3rd Virginia Cavalry from 1861 through 1865.  His cap has dark blue cloth sides, and the crown and band are a steel- or perhaps a sheep’s gray, in a coarse jeans fabric.  The cap has gold lace for the rank of lieutenant and infantry, script “I” chinstrap buttons.  It might be surmised that Harwood bought the cap at a tailor shop based on size and availability, the tailor not having a cavalry cap in Harwood’s size on hand.  One might also presume a late war provenance for the cap since it survived the war.52

Picture
057: Harwood's variegated cap is representative of the fine quality, officer versions of this type,possibly with the exception of the use of coarse jeans fabric for the crown and band components. The collection for this cap is unknown.
A variegated Richmond-style cap worn by Captain Benjamin Chase, 22nd Virginia Infantry has an early war provenance.  Chase wore this cap prior to his death at the Battle of Lewisburg, May 23, 1862.  Chase’s cap is made in the enlisted style, without gold lace, in a “black, dark gray, black” color scheme.  The band and crown fabric are brown velvet, faded from black, and the sides are dark gray broadcloth.  The chinstrap is missing, but the cap retains its non-military, brass buttons.  The visor is an officer-quality, bound leather type.  Chase’s cap might loosely be classed as infantry since infantrymen so frequently used black as a trim color.  In any case, the cap points to the early use of the variegated style by soldiers in Virginia.53

Picture
058a: Benjamin Chase's cap is an early example of the variegated style, and employs the typically early war black trim color. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
Picture
058b: A close view of the Chase basic fabric shows it to be a dark, steel gray color. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.
There is actually more evidence for the variegated infantry cap in contemporary photos.  These images were taken in Richmond, Virginia, April 1865, after fall of the Confederacy.  They depict numerous paroled Confederate soldiers with caps, as well as scores of Richmond boys, who all wore Confederate army caps, taken, no doubt, from the defunct Richmond clothing depot.  Some of these caps clearly have the “light blue, cadet gray, light blue” color scheme of the Richmond infantry cap, discernable despite the gray tones of the black and white images.54

Picture
059a: A paroled soldier in Richmond, April 1865, wears what appears to be an infantry, variegated Richmond cap with a light blue, cadet gray, light blue color scheme. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress, WMS 9 00443a.
Picture
059b: A close view of the paroled soldier with the Richmond infantry cap. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress, WMS 9 00443a.
Picture
059c: A young boy in Richmond 1865 also wears a Richmond Depot, variegated infantry cap. Notably, he has his cap cocked to the right, which was customary at the time. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress, LPR 1 02899.
Picture
059c: A close view of the Richmond boy with the variegated infantry cap, in color scheme light blue, gray, light blue. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress, LPR 1 02899.
 Richmond Depot caps have a character about them that I believe the manufacturers purposely affected.  Just as the Richmond Depot, during the last part of the war, gave preferential use of cadet gray cloth for jackets, I think authorities likewise desired cadet gray caps.  They wanted a degree of uniformity.  By using cadet gray cloth for jackets and caps, even if pants varied in texture and shade, the Army of Northern Virginia achieved a uniqueness and uniformity that paralleled the Union army.55  From 1864 onwards, the Army of Northern Virginia had a standard uniform: the cadet gray Richmond cap and jacket.  This is what is most fascinating about the Richmond cap.  Even though the average Johnny Reb may not have donned it, the Richmond cap is proof that the Southern quartermaster could produce a truly universal uniform for Lee’s army.  It reflects a spirit of resilience, discipline, and order under the most trying of circumstances.  And, it was accomplished even as the Southern Confederacy was on its last legs, and its army was marching into the jaws of hell.

Copyright: This study and its contents are copyrighted to the Adolphus Confederate Uniforms website with the exception of those images that are part of the Library of Congress collection, or in the public domain.

Click this link to navigate to Part III of this study...



Bibliography

27. These dimensions were taken from the Richmond caps that the author examined and measured.

28. Howard, McHenry, Recollections of a Maryland Confederate Soldier and Staff Officer Under Johnston, Jackson and Lee, Morningside Bookshop, Dayton, Ohio, 1975, pp. 354-355 note 360, 454-455 note 355, 368 & 388; A brigade of six battalions of heavy artillery were armed with muskets under the command of Colonel Stapleton Crutchfield. The battalions included the 10th and 19th Virginia Battalions, the 18th and 20th Virginia Battalions, the 18th Georgia Battalion, and one other. (pp. 354-355) This unit was formed in the spring of 1865, (see also p. 360, note 11, and pp. 454-455, note from p. 355).  Crutchfield’s Heavy Artillery Brigade numbered about 1,400.  “The heavy artillerymen having been stationary around Richmond had been able to keep their uniforms in better plight, and their scarlet caps and trimmings (artillery color) made them present a distinctive appearance to the army, of which they were now a regular part,” (p. 368, April 1865). Regarding the retreat from Richmond (p. 388), the heavy artillery was distinctive by its bravery and uniforms, “In fact, it is evident to me that the fresher and variegated caps and uniforms of the heavy artillerymen made the enemy suppose they belonged to the ‘Navy Brigade’ or battalion,…” The reference to the Maryland prisoners is taken from The Letters of Colonel Theodore Lyman: From the Wilderness to Appomattox, 1922, p. 221.

29. Jones, John B., A Rebel War Clerk’s Diary, Volume I, Time Life, 1982 reprint of the original Lippincott, 1866 publication; Crenshaw’s woolen prices on February 1, 1863, p. 252, Vol. I, (hereafter, J.B. Jones).

30. Richmond Enquirer, 17 October 1861.

31. This data is drawn from the independent research of C.L. Webster. Webster drew on the National Archives, Record Group 109, Confederate Papers Relating Citizens or Business Firms, 1861-65, Microcopy 346 (hereafter, CSA Citizens M346, with appropriate roll number and reference), from the following: Frank Binford, Roll 65; Martin Brittain, Roll 98; F.M. Burford, Roll 120; Robert L. Dickinson, Roll 246; Henry Domler, Roll 252; Ellet & Weisiger, Roll 280; Charles L. McIndoe, Roll 632; Mary R. McIndoe, Roll 632; Thomas L. Pugh, Roll 826; I.C. Rittenhouse, Roll 868.

32. CSA Citizens M346, Roll 65, Frank Binford.

33. CSA Officers M346, Roll 186 and CSA Citizens M346, Roll 186, A representative invoice for cap fronts is one paid by Captain F.W. Dillard, Quartermaster, Columbus, Georgia Depot. On 5 December 1863, Dillard bought 8,823 cap visors from the Columbus Knitting Company for $4,852.65.

34. CSA Citizens M346, Roll 65, Frank Binford. Furthermore, the first large-scale shipments of imported, cadet gray kersey arrived at Richmond in the spring of 1863. The first uniforms made of this cloth were issued to Army of Northern Virginia troops in May 1863. During August, the cadet gray jackets were issued en masse to the army, along with pants made of imported, light-blue kersey.

35. Wilson, Harold S., Confederate Industry: Manufacturers and Quartermasters in the Civil War, University of Mississippi Press, Jackson, 2002, (hereafter, Wilson), p. 127, from The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Series 4, Volume 3, pp. 1039-1041, (hereafter, OR, with appropriate Series, Volume, Part, Chapter and pages), A.R. Lawton, C.S. Quartermaster General’s Office, Richmond, reported to Hon. Mr. Miller, Chairman Special Committee, on 27 January 1865, the field issues to the Army of Northern Virginia during the 3rd and 4th quarters of 1864, and up to 21 January 1865.  These issues included 27,011 hats and caps.

36. Artifact and images courtesy of the New York State Division of Military Affairs, Military History Collection, Catalog Number CM 1995-5011. The author examined the cap in April 2009. This cap is featured in Echoes of Glory, Arms and Equipment of the Confederacy, Time-Life Books, Alexandria, Virginia, 1991, p. 156.

37. Artifacts and images courtesy of Gary Hendershott Museum Consultants, Little Rock, Arkansas, Gladium II Catalog, 2011, Lot #15, and Civil War Catalog, Sale 140, October 2008, Lot #216, (hereafter, Hendershott, with applicable reference).

38. Artifact and images courtesy of The Horse Soldier, 219 Steinwehr Avenue, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, online catalog 2008.

39. Artifact courtesy the Miller-Kite House, Elkton, Virginia; images courtesy of Greg Starbuck.

40. Artifact courtesy of the Pittsylvania Historical Society collection, Chatham, Virginia; images courtesy of Greg Starbuck.

41. Artifact and images courtesy of Hendershott, Gladium III Catalog, Sale 153, Lot #2016; and, the American Civil War Museum (artifact only).

42. Bell Irvin Wiley, Embattled Confederates, Bonanza Books, New York, 1964, p. 104, Crenshaw image of Farrell, MOC collection; see also article in NSTCW, Volume 36, No. 2, 2012, Serrano, p. 34; Leslie D. Jensen, Johnny Reb, The Uniform of the Confederate Army, 1861-1865, Greenhill Books, London & Stackpole Books, Pennsylvania, 1996, p. 52, unidentified Crenshaw image, Jensen declined to share the source.

43. Jensen, Leslie D., A Survey of Confederate Central Government Quartermaster Issue Jackets, Part II, Military Collector & Historian, Vol. XLI, No. 4, Fall & Winter 1989, (hereafter, Jensen, Survey, Part II).

44. Artifact and image courtesy of Hendershott, Civil War Catalog, Sale 140, October 2008, Lot #213.

45. Artifact courtesy of the South Carolina Relic Room, Columbia, South Carolina. The author examined the cap on 29 June 2002.

46. Artifact and image courtesy of Fort Donelson National Battlefield, Dover, Tennessee.

47. Artifact courtesy of the Texas Civil War Museum, Fort Worth, Texas. The author viewed the artifact in May 2008 and January 2009.

48. Artifact and image courtesy of Battleground Antiques, Will Gorges, New Bern, North Carolina, website, ca November 2015.

49. Artifact and photos courtesy of Deep South Artifacts, Inc., Keith B. Kenerly, Fredericksburg, Virginia, website, 5 February 2002. Artist color sketch courtesy of Alan Archambault.

50. Roanoke Antique Store, the author viewed the auction color photographs on 19 and 20 May 1992.

51. Artifact courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia. The author examined the cap on 15 October 2013.

52. Collection unknown; CSRs Virginia, M324, Roll 30.

53. Artifact and image courtesy of the American Civil War Museum, Richmond, Virginia.

54. Images are courtesy of the Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, Washington, D.C. (hereafter, Library of Congress).

55. The disproportionally high numbers of surviving original, cadet gray jackets, pants and caps from the Army of Northern Virginia bear out this assertion.